LAWS(RAJ)-2013-5-54

MUKUT SINGH Vs. SONIYA KANWAR

Decided On May 16, 2013
MUKUT SINGH Appellant
V/S
Soniya Kanwar Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD learned counsel for the petitioner.

(2.) THIS revision petition under Section 397 read with Section 401 Cr.P.C. is directed against the judgment and order dated 28.06.2012 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge(Fast Track) No. 5, Jaipur Metropolitan, Jaipur(hereinafter referred to as 'the Appellate Court ") in Criminal Appeal No. 36/2012, whereby the appeal of the appellant-petitioner filed under Section 29 of the Protection of Women From Domestic Violence Act, 2005(hereinafter referred to as 'the Act of 2005') was dismissed, upholding the order dated 27.03.2012 passed by the learned Additional Civil Judge(Junior Division) and Metropolitan Magistrate, Court No. 20, Jaipur Metropolitan, Jaipur(hereinafter referred to as 'the Trial Court') in Case No. 116/2009, whereby learned Trial Court partly allowed the application under Section 23(2) of the Act of 2005 filed by the respondent-wife and directed the petitioner-husband to pay Rs. 1,000/- to respondent-wife Soniya Kanwar and Rs. 1,000/- to his daughter Resu Singh, total Rs. 2,000/- per month as interim maintenance from the date of filing of the complaint.

(3.) CONSEQUENTLY , the revision petition, having no merit, is, hereby, dismissed.