RAVI KUMAR SHARMA Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD the learned counsel for petitioner.

(2.) PETITIONER has preferred this writ petition challenging the Notification dated 29.01.2013, issued by the Department of Rural Development and Panchayati Raj, Government of Rajasthan, whereby existing second proviso to Rule 273 of the Rajasthan Panchayati Raj Rules, 1996(hereinafter referred to as 'the Rules of 1996'), has been substituted by a new proviso, as mentioned in the above Notification.

(3.) WE have considered the submissions of the learned counsel for petitioner.