PANCHU RAM Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) The instant misc. petition has been preferred by the petitioner assailing the order dated 15.2,2013 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Prabatsar in revision whereby, the learned revisional Court upheld the order dated 25.1.2012 passed by the learned ACJM, Makrana in Cr. Original Case No. 46/12 taking cognizance against the petitioner for the offences under Sections 376, 323, and 379 of the IPC.

(2.) The notice of the Final Report was given to the prosecutrix, who filed a protest petition against the same and examined herself and Harkaran and Hanumana Ram under Section 200/202 Cr. P.C.

(3.) The learned Magistrate proceeded to accept the protest petition and took cognizance against the accused for the offences under Sections 376, 323 and 379 of the IPC. Being aggrieved of the order dated 25.1.2012, the petitioner preferred a revision which too, has been rejected as stated above. Hence, the instant misc. petition has been preferred by the petitioner seeking quashing of the order taking cognizance and all subsequent proceedings sought to be taken against him.