GOVARDHAN LAL GARI Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD learned counsel for the petitioner. The petitioner has introduced himself to be a graduate holding as well B.Ed. degree. According to him, he had also served as a Teacher from 1.7.2000 to 30.6.2003 at Upper Primary School, Sajjangarh. That he had also undertaken various academic courses pertaining to different facets of the education system, has been stated. In response to the advertisement dated 31.5.2008 issued for appointment to the post of Prabodhak under the Rajasthan Panchayati Raj Prabodhak Service Rules, 2008 (for short, hereinafter referred to as "the Rules"), the petitioner had applied but was not called for interview as he was not construed to be eligible because he was lacking in teaching experience as prescribed by Rule 14 of the Rules. Situated thus, the petitioner has impeached the vires of this provision of the Rules repudiating it to be illegal and unconstitutional.

(2.) THE learned counsel for the petitioner has reiterated the above. He has argued in particular that as the Rajasthan Panchayati Raj Act, 1994 (for short, hereinafter referred to as "the Act") does not stipulate such experience to be an essential condition of eligiblity for the post of Prabodhak, the provision to that effect made in the Rules is apparently non est. Further, as this prescription is in contravention of the criteria stipulated by the National Council for Teacher Education, on this count alone, it is ab initio void. The decisions of the Hon'ble Apex Court in All India Judges' Association and ors. V/s Union of India and ors. ((2002) 4 SCC 247) and of a Coordinate Bench of this Court in Kailash Chandra Harijan V/s State of Rajasthan & Ors. (2006(2) RLW 1700) have been relied upon.

(3.) IT would be patent from the above extract that five years teaching experience without any break in any recognized educational institution/educational project is an imperative condition of eligibility for the post of Prabodhak. Whereas paragraph 32 of the decision in All India Judges' Association (supra) referred to by the learned counsel for the petitioner relates to the acceptance of the recommendation of the Shetty Commission doing away with the requirement of three years standing at the Bar for a candidate aspiring to enter judicial service, the determination in Kailash Chandra Harijan (supra) dilates on the validity of the addition of the qualification of B.Ed. as an alternate of BSTC in Rule 266 of the Rajasthan Panchayati Raj Rules, 1996.