JUGAL Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) IN pursuance of the order passed in morning session, the Deputy Registrar (Judl.) has recorded the statements of Narendra, the petitioner No.2, and of Islam Ali and Yunus Ali, the complainant-respondents No.2 and 3 respectively. Both Islam Ali and Yunus Ali inform this court that in 2008, they had enrolled with Juglal Poonia Education Institute for Computer Education. For this purpose, they had submitted a fee of Rs.5,000.00 each with the petitioners. However, as they were dissatisfied with the training being imparted to them, they had requested the petitioners to return the fee amount. However, they refused to do so. Thus, they lodged a FIR, namely FIR No.117/12, at Police Station Malsisar, District Jhunjhunu for offences under Sections 420, 406, 467, 468, 471, 120B IPC. Subsequently, the parties have settled their dispute. According to Islam Ali and Yunus Ali they have received the fee amount from the petitioners. Hence, they are not interested in pursuing the aforesaid FIR lodged by them. Thus, a joint prayer has been made by the petitioner No.2, and respondents No.2 and 3 that the FIR in question should be quashed by this court.

(2.) IN the case of Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab and Another [2012 (9) SCC 427], the Hon'ble Apex Court had observed as under :-