RICHA SINGH Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS.

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD Mr. Ajatshatru Mina, learned counsel for the petitioner. For the order proposed to be passed, it is considered inessential to issue formal notice to the respondents.

(2.) THE petitioner, a citizen of India, has introduced herself to be an employee of Bank of Baroda, Jaipur, besides being devoted to the research work on "Environment, Humans and Values: An Anthropocentric and Eco -centric Perspective". She seeks judicial intervention for the following reliefs: -

(3.) THE reliefs, as the text of the petition would disclose, stem from the petitioner's perception of contravention, more particularly of the Rajasthan Prevention of Defacement of Property Act, 2006 (for short, hereafter referred to as the Act) and the inexplicable inaction of the concerned authorities to remove the unauthorized and unregulated affixation of posters and advertisements, more particularly by the various political groups for factional benefits and also by other unscrupulous elements for personal gain thereby, defacing public property leading to violation of the guarantee to life contained in Article 21 of the Constitution of India. According to the petitioner, such posters and advertisements appearing over traffic signals, direction boards, Metro pillars etc. not only defile the aesthetic quotient of the City of Jaipur, but also are creating utter confusion in the minds of commuters in general to the detriment of the public at large. Referring, amongst others, to the Rajasthan Municipalities Act, 1959, Rajasthan Police Act, 1957, Indian Penal Code as well as Prevention of Damages to Public Property Act, 1984, the petitioner has alleged total inaction on the part of the concerned State functionaries to undo and prevent such illegal and indiscriminate defacement of public property.