SAJIDA RAFIQ Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE petitioner has laid this writ petition for claiming under mentioned reliefs:-

(2.) TO claim the aforementioned reliefs the facts adumbrated in nut-shell are that at the threshold of the service career, the petitioner was appointed as Teacher Grade-III vide order dated 5.11.1977. After completion of the probation period, the petitioner was confirmed on the said post and vide office order dated 12.11.1980, she was allowed Annual Grade Increment. The petitioner has specifically averd in the writ petition that when she was posted at Government Upper Primary School, Kajnaukala, Jodhpur, a fraud was practicised and a spurious application purported to have been moved on her behalf was submitted before the competent authority to transfer her from that school. In fact, as per the petitioner, no such application was submitted by her.

(3.) LEARNED counsel for the petitioner Mr. Vinay Jain and Mr. Kshamendra Mathur have vehemently argued that after cancellation of order of transfer, the petitioner has submitted her joining before the Principal of institution on 28.1.1985, but she was not permitted to join her duties and till date, she has not received any communication from respondents for joining her duties. Substantiating her contentions, learned counsel would urge that there was a total callousness on the part of the department in completion of the inquiry and, therefore, since 1985 she has not been able to perform her duties.