PRITHVI SINGH RAJVI Vs. STATE

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THESE five matters, one being the intra -court appeal and other being the writ petitions, relate to the same subject -matter and hence, have been considered together; and are taken up for disposal by this common order.

(2.) THE learned counsel for the parties are ad idem that the similar nature petitions led by D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3982/2013 ­ Girish Purohit and Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors., have been considered and disposed of by a Co -ordinate Bench of this Court on 18.10.2013.

(3.) IT remains trite that relaxation can be claimed only if, and to the extent, permissible under the Rules. In the case of Prem Ratan Modi Vs. The State of Rajasthan & Ors.: 2013 RLW(1) 700, this Court took note of the law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the cases of Malik Mazhar Sultan & Anr. Vs. U.P.Public Service Commission & Ors.: (2006) 9 SCC 507; and Rajasthan Public Service Commission Vs. Smt. Anand Kanwar & Ors.: Civil Appeal No.52/1993, decided on 08.02.1995 as under: - "In Malik Mazhar Sultan's case (supra) even when emphasizing on the requirement of timely determination of the vacancies and timely appointments in relation to the U.P. Judicial Services, so far the age requirement was concerned, the Hon'ble Supreme Court held as under: -