JAGDISH Vs. MAQSOOD AHMED

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD learned counsel for the petitioner and respondents-contemnors.

(2.) THIS contempt petition is arising out of order dated 16.10.2006 passed by a Coordinate Bench of this Court disposing of writ petition filed by the petitioner with the following directions: -

(3.) ON the other hand, Mr. M.R. Singhvi, Sr. Advocate assisted by Mr. Dharma Ram, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that there were two persons promoted for vacancies of the year 1981 for the post of L.D.C., namely, Kailash Ranga and Surendra Kumar Vyas, whose promotions orders, however, were later on withdrawn by the respondent- Board. He further submitted that for this, the respondents have not explained the position of these two vacancies against which these two persons, namely, Kailash Ranga and Surendra Kumar Vyas were promoted, whereas the petitioner had right to be considered for being promoted to the post of L.D.C. against the vacancies of the year 1981 also. He, therefore, submitted that the directions of this Court remained un-complied with, and such non-compliance being deliberate, the respondents deserve to be punished in contempt jurisdiction by this Court.