NARAYAN LAL Vs. RRVPN LTD.

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD learned counsel for the parties. In this writ petition, following prayer has been made by the petitioner: -

(2.) THE basic argument of learned counsel for the petitioner is that after due application of mind, the order Annexure -5 was passed by the respondents on 30.12.1994 whereby he was granted benefit of stepping up and his pay was fixed after granting benefit of stepping up but after retirement the respondents passed an order for recovery of the benefits extended to the petitioner vide order Annexure -5 dt. 30.12.1994 without disclosing any reasons.

(3.) LEARNED counsel for the respondents submits that the benefit granted to the petitioner vide Annexure -5 was erroneously granted, therefore, it was felt necessary that at the time of finalization of retrial benefits that recovery is to be made from the retrial benefits, therefore, recovery order has been passed in this case. Therefore, it is prayed that this writ petition may be dismissed.