VIKARAM SINGH BHATI Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE defects pointed by the Registry have been removed by learned counsel for the petitioner in the Court itself.

(2.) LEARNED counsel for the petitioner states that similar writ petitions involving identical controversy i.e. S.B.C.W.P. Nos.6566/2013, 4983/2013 and 6618/2013 have already been decided by this Court on 30.5.2013, 4.10.2013 and 29.5.2013 respectively.

(3.) LEARNED counsel for the petitioner contended that the Assistant Registrar, Cooperative had no jurisdiction to pass the impugned order exercising powers under Section 125 of the Act. It is submitted that by virtue of provisions of Section 30B of the Act, which provides that the Credit Cooperative Society shall have fully autonomy in all its financial internal administrative matters pertaining to the staffing, recruitment, posting and compensation to staff and therefore, no order, which has an effect of curtailing the freedom of the Society could have been passed by the Assistant Registrar.