(1.) THE learned counsel for the contesting respondent (writ- petitioner) having appeared, while dispensing with service on the proforma respondent, i.e., respondent No.2, at the request and with the consent of the learned counsel for parties, we have heard the matter finally at this stage.
(2.) THIS being an intra-court appeal essentially against an interim order passed in a pending writ petition and for the order proposed to be passed, dilatation on all the factual aspects does not appear necessary. Only a brief reference to the background aspects would suffice.
(3.) THE said writ petition was entertained by a learned Single Judge of this Court on 26.06.2013 and, while issuing notices to the respondents returnable by 02.07.2013, status quo was ordered to be maintained.