SURESH CHANDRA MATHUR Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD learned counsel for the petitioner. Apart from seeking an appropriate writ, order or direction to the respondents to grant him appointment to the post of Junior Engineer (Diploma Holder) with all consequential benefits with effect from the date on which he had acquired qualification therefor i.e. 10.6.2003, the vires of proviso (6) to Rule 6 of the Rajasthan Engineering Subordinate Service (Public Health Branch) Rules, 1967 (for short, hereinafter referred to as "the Rules") to the extent it provides the cut off date as 1.4.1988 for the application thereof, has been challenged. The advertisement dated 17.5.2008 and the appointments made on the basis of selection process initiated thereby to the post of Junior Engineer (Civil )(Diploma Holder) have been sought to be quashed as well.

(2.) CONCISELY put, the pleaded case of the petitioner is that he was initially appointed as a work -charged employee on 1.5.1988 with the Public Health & Engineering Department of the State and was eventually conferred semi permanent status with effect from 1.5.1990. According to him, he was posted as Helper in the District Sub Division -III, Mandore, Jodhpur. He has averred that in course of his service, on due permission from the concerned authorities, he did pursue higher studies and in the year 2002, passed the Technician Engineers Examination as is evident from the certificate dated 10.6.2003 to that effect, which according to him, is equivalent to the Diploma in Mechanical Engineering as conducted by the State Polytechnics. The petitioner has referred to a policy decision of the State Government taken in the year 1989 to encourage departmental employees who would pursue higher studies and acquire qualifications based thereon, following which, proviso (6) to Rule 6 of the Rules was added. The Public Health & Engineering Department (for short, hereinafter referred to as "the Department") to which the petitioner belongs was brought within the ambit of the above provision of the Rules by notification dated 9.5.1997.

(3.) WE have duly considered the pleaded facts, documents and the the arguments advanced. Proviso (6) to Rule (6) of the Rules had been inserted vide Notification No.F.3(1) DOP/A -II/88 dated 21.12.1989. It provides that persons employed on work -charged basis in Public Works Department/Irrigation Department, Aryurved Department, who had put in atleast two years continuous service as on 1.4.1988 and such other employees who had been working in the lower posts in the Department and are possessed of the requisite qualifications for direct recruitment to any of the post of Driver, Tracers, Ferooman, Junior Draftsman, Laboratory Assistant, Laboratory Attendant etc. might be considered once only for appointment on these posts against direct recruitment quota alongwith fresh names received from open market candidates and upto 50% vacant posts might be filled out of the above categories of work -charged and other employees in relaxation of age limit prescribed in these rules, provided they are otherwise found suitable by the Selection Committee. Proviso (6) to Rule (6) is quoted hereinbelow: -