KALURAM Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS application for suspension of sentence has been preferred by accused appellants Kaluram and Ajay Kumar who have been convicted for offence under Sec. 302 read with Section 34 of IPC and sentenced to undergo the life imprisonment. Contention of learned counsel for the appellants is that deceased Amit died due to head injury as per the statement of Dr. H.S. Fagadia (PW1) who has proved the post mortem report Ex.P -1. The learned counsel for the appellants has taken the Court through the statements of Smt. Rekha (PW3), Pradeep Kumar (PW4) and Sanjay Soni (PW6) and has also referred to the allegations made in the first information report Ex. -P4 and argued that allegations have been made against all three accused Kaluram, Ajay Kumar and co -accused Vijay (who is juvenile and is facing trial separately) of causing single head injury which has proved fatal. Recovery of weapon has been shown only at the instance of accused appellant Ajay Kumar. The incident took place on account of some altercation between children of two families. Trial Court was persuaded to grant bail to accused appellant Kaluram pending trial as no recovery was made at his instance. It is also argued that hearing of the appeal is likely to take a long time, therefore, sentence of the appellants be suspended.

(2.) LEARNED Public Prosecutor and the learned counsel for the complainant opposed the bail application.