PUKHA RAM PARIHAR Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE petitioner has filed this writ petition with the following prayers: -

(2.) BRIEF facts of the case are that the petitioner was appointed as teacher vide order dated 17.11.1981, passed by the Vikas Adhikari, Panchayat Samiti Desuri, purely on temporary basis till availability of regularly selected teachers. The petitioner worked as a teacher at Panchayat Samiti Desuri till 20.10.1983. While serving as teacher at Panchayat Samiti Desuri, the petitioner appeared in recruitment process for appointment on the post of school lecturer in Education Department initiated by the Rajasthan Public Service Commission and the petitioner was selected and joined as School Lecturer in the Education Department on 21.10.1983. After attaining the age of superannuation, the petitioner retired from the post of Principal on 31.10.2011 from the Education Department.

(3.) LEARNED counsel for the petitioner has argued that the case of the petitioner does not fall under Rule 8 of the Rajasthan Civil Service (Pension) Rules 1996 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Rules of 1996') wherein certain claims to pension were declared as inadmissible and, therefore, the services rendered by the petitioner as teacher at Panchayat Samiti, Desuri are liable to be counted as qualifying service for the purpose of determining his pension and retiral benefits.