LEELADHAR SHARMA Vs. UNION OF INDIA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD finally with the consent of learned counsel for the parties.

(2.) BOTH the writ petitions are directed against common order dated 30th May, 2012 passed by Central Administrative Tribunal, Jodhpur Bench, Jodhpur, whereby Original Applications Nos. 56/2011 and 62/2011 challenging the charge-sheets dated 4th February, 2011 under Rule 16 of the CCA Rules, 1965 have been dismissed.

(3.) SUBMISSION of learned counsel for petitioner is that after decision of the Tribunal and during pendency of these writ petitions, the petitioner gave a representation dated 22nd October, 2012 (Annex.9) to the respondents with a prayer for holding a detailed enquiry into the allegations. The said representation was considered petitioner was informed vide letter dated 5th December, 2012 and that documents have been allowed to be perused on 15th October, 2012, therefore, demand of holding detailed enquiry can not be accepted. Subsequently, the petitioner again submitted a representation dated 10th December, 2012. The said representation is said to be pending with the respondents.