(1.) THESE three writ petitions are disposed by this common order.
(2.) THE facts are illustratively taken from S.B. CWP No. 788/2012 Gandhi Vidya Mandir vs. State and Ors.
(3.) THE learned counsels for the petitioner submitted that as a matter of fact 50 educational institutions are being run by the petitioner society on the said land and the respondent Municipal Board, Sardarshahar, Dist. Churu is not entitled to demand any conversion charges for the alleged use of agricultural land for non agricultural purposes, nor the respondent Municipal Board could, restrict the on going construction activities on the part of the said land allotted to the petitioner society when they were undertaking such construction in the year 2008 2009 and therefore, aggrieved by the notice and the communications issued by the respondent Municipal Board demanding such conversion charges requiring the petitioner and deposit the same under the provisions of Section 173A of the Act and also to comply with the conditions of Section 170 of the Act for raising such construction only with the approval of the maps and sanction by the respondent Municipal Board within whose jurisdiction the entire area including the land in question admittedly falls and not to undertake any construction activity without such prior approval of the respondent Municipal Board, Sardarshahar.