REGENT COMPUTRONICS PVT. LTD.

JWALA PRATAP SINGH (SHRI) Appellant

V/S

SHRI R.D. MATHUR Respondents

Referred Judgements :-

J.C. MANDOZA VS. J.L. MARTIN [REFERRED TO]
SHRI SHEENA NAIK VS. SHRI LAWRENCE D`SOUZA [REFERRED TO]
SATYA GUPTA @ MADHU GUPTA VS. BRIJESH KUMAR [REFERRED TO]
RAM PRASAD RAJAK VS. NAND KUMAR & BROS. & ANR. [REFERRED TO]
RAKESH GUPTA VS. AHMED FAROOQ [REFERRED TO]
JAGDISH VS. SMT. PREMLATA RAI [REFERRED TO]
SHEEL CHAND VS. PRAKASH CHAND [REFERRED TO]
GOPAL KRISHNAJI KETKAR VS. MOHAMMED HAJI LALIF AND OTHERS [REFERRED TO]
SAIT TARAJEE KHIMCHAND VS. VELAMARTI SATYAM ALIAS SATTEYYA [REFERRED TO]
HASMAT RAI VS. RAGHUNATH PRASAD [REFERRED TO]
VARIETY EMPORIUM VS. V R M MOHAMMAD IBRAHIM NAINA [REFERRED TO]
GOVIND VS. JEETSINGH [REFERRED TO]
RAMESH KUMAR VS. KESHO RAM [REFERRED TO]
PRIYA BALA GHOSH VS. BAJRANGLAL SINGHANIA [REFERRED TO]
JAGDISH SINGH VS. NATTHU SINGH [REFERRED TO]
SHADI SINGH VS. RAKHA [REFERRED TO]
P V PAPANNA VS. K PADMANABHAIAH [REFERRED TO]
MOHAMMAD YUNUS VS. GURUBUX SINGH [REFERRED TO]
SARLA AHUJA VS. UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED [REFERRED TO]
DATTATRAYA LAXMAN KAMBLE VS. ABDUL RASUL MOULALI KOTKUNDE [REFERRED TO]
T SIVASUBRAMANIAM VS. KASINATH PUJARI [REFERRED TO]
LABANYA NEOGI VS. W B ENGINEERING COMPANY [REFERRED TO]
RAGHUNATH G PANHALE VS. CHAGANLAL SUNDARJI [REFERRED TO]
GAYA PRASAD VS. PRADEEP SRIVASTAVA [REFERRED TO]
HAFZAT HUSSAIN S O MUBARAK HUSSAIN VS. ABDUL MAJEED S O WALI MOHAMMAD SHEIKH BALLAN [REFERRED TO]
R C TAMRAKAR VS. NIDI LEKHA [REFERRED TO]
JOGINDER PAL VS. NAVAL KISHORE BEHAL [REFERRED TO]
BHAGIRATH VS. RAM PRASAD [REFERRED TO]

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS civil second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure is preferred by the appellant- tenant against the judgment and decree dated 17/7/2001 whereby learned Additional District Judge No. 1, Ajmer affirmed the judgment and decree of eviction passed on 16/8/1994 by learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Ajmer City (North), Ajmer.

(2.) THE relevant facts in brief are that the plaintiff/landlord/respondent (hereinafter to be referred as plaintiff) filed a civil suit for arrears of rent and eviction on 21/5/1987 with the averments that the defendant-tenant-appellant (hereinafter to be referred as defendant) is the tenant in the suit premises; house No. B1 at Ajmer on monthly rent of Rs. 400/- . THE tenancy was oral. THE suit for eviction was based on various grounds including the default in payment of rent for a period of more than six months and reasonable and bonafide requirement of the plaintiff giving details of the said grounds in the plaint.

(3.) WITH regard to first question of law, the defendant during pendency of the first appeal filed an application under Order 6 Rule 17 C.P.C. with the averments that the plaintiff wants to sell the suit property and a number of persons visited the suit property along with property dealers in February, 1997, hence the defendant may be allowed to amend his written statement. This application was opposed by the plaintiff. Learned Additional District Judge No. 1, Ajmer dismissed this application being vague vide order dated 28/1/1998. S.B. Civil Revision Petition No. 283/1998 against this order filed by the defendant was dismissed by this Court vide order dated 9/7/1998 with a direction that the defendant shall be at liberty to move the learned lower appellate court under Order 41 Rule 27 C.P.C. to bring subsequent events on the record.

Click here to view full judgment.

JWALA PRATAP SINGH Vs. SHRI R D MATHUR

Referred Judgements :-

JUDGEMENT

QUick Links

Get in Touch

Email

Contact Numbers

Address