VIJAY SINGH PUNIYA Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) These are two applications : DB Civil Misc, Application No. 249/2003, has been filed by Sanganer Kapda Rangai Chhapal Association, which was respondent No. 8 in DB Civil Writ Petition No. 2075/94, whereas DB Civil Misc. Application No. 256/2003 has been filed by the State of Rajasthan. Both the applications are for modification and clarification of our judgment and order dated 7-3-2003 (Reported in AIR 2003 Raj 286). In DB Civil Misc. Application No. 249/2003, it has been prayed as follows :

(2.) By judgment and order dated 7-3-2003 (Reported in AIR 2003 Raj 286) we held that the dyeing and printing units are discharging effluents, which are polluting the water sources used for agricultural and drinking purposes. We also observed that neither respondent No. 8 nor Rajasthan State Industrial Development and Investment Corporation had taken any concrete steps to pre- vent pollution. While disposing of the writ petition, we directed as follows :

(3.) On 30-5-2003, it was submitted on behalf of the respondent No. 8 Association that shifting of the industry to industrial areas developed by RIICO shall entail huge expenses and it should be allowed to continue at present sites. It was also contended that pollution could be controlled by setting up CETPs in Sanganer area where dyeing and printing industry is located. It was also submitted that dyeing and printing industry shall provide the funds for setting up of requisite number of CETPs.