RAMAVTAR SHARMA Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD learned Counsel for the petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor and perused the case diary. It was argued that Govind Ram who as Sarpanch is said to have issued Patta in question is on anticipatory bail by this Court and the allegation against the present accused petitioner is that he got this Patta. Learned Public Prosecutor opposed it and contested that he is the main accused. I have considered the submission. Keeping in view the fact that Govind Ram has been enlarged on bail by his Court. It would not be proper to deny the bail to the present accused petitioner.

(2.) TAKING into consideration the entire facts and circumstances of the case, it is just and proper to grant bail to the petitioner under Section 438, CrpC.