KESU RAM Vs. ZILA PARISHAD SRIGANGANAGAR

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD learned counsel for the parties. This appeal is directed against the judgment of the learned Single Judge dated 12. 4. 99 dismissing the writ petition filed by the petitioner.

(2.) THE petitioner was an aspirant of being appointing as a teacher grade III in pursuance of advertisement dated 15. 6. 98 issued by Zila Parishad, Sri Ganganagar. However, the petitioner did not find place in merit and his candidature was rejected and he was not given appointment.

(3.) MOREOVER, it was also urged by the learned counsel for the respondents, that with the commencement of the Rajasthan Panchayati Raj Rules 1996, which laid down the crietarion procedure and method of selection for appointment to different posts under the Panchayati Raj. institutions vide notification dated 30. 12. 96. Governing the selection and recruitment to any post under the Panchayati Raj Institution was occupied field of the Act of 1994 and Rules of 1996 framed thereunder. The executive order issued in exercise of power conferred under the repealed rules cannot survive for the benefit of the petitioner thereafter. He also pointed out that Division Bench judgments relied upon by the learned counsel for the appellant do not help the petitioner in respect of the controversy raised in this case which depends purely upon the consideration of rules laying down, eligibility crietarion and evaluation of merit.