LAWS(RAJ)-1992-4-58

REGAL SPORTS Vs. MOHD SIDDIQUE

Decided On April 22, 1992
REGAL SPORTS Appellant
V/S
Mohd Siddique Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) BOTH these appeals under Section 110 -D of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939, filed against the judgment of the learned M.A.C.T., Jodhpur, dated 23.7.1983 in case No. 48 of 1980.

(2.) SINCE both the appeals are arising out of the same award they are being disposed of by this common judgment.

(3.) MR . B.K. Mehta, learned counsel for the non -claimant appellant, has submitted that the learned Tribunal has erred in assuming the expected age of the deceased to be 75 years whereas the appellant has stated that at the time of accident, the deceased was 25 years old and was expected to live for 30 years more, in the claim petition. He has further submitted that the widow of the deceased has got remarried in the year 1988, so the award is to be reduced and adjusted according to the date of marriage only.