RATAN KANWAR Vs. TEJ BHAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS revision petition is directed against the order dated July 17,1992, passed by the Additional District Judge No. 2, Sri Ganganagar, by which the learned Additional District Judge dismissed the application filed by the petitioner for recording her statement on Commission and, also, closed her evidence.

(2.) TEJ Bhan filed a suit against the petitioner in the Court of the learned Additional District Judge No. 2 Sri Ganganagar. During the pendency of the suit, on various dates the petitioner appeared alongwith her witnesses but her statement could not be recorded. The case was fixed for recording the statement of the defendant-petitioner on December 20, 1991 and on that day, an application under Order 26 rules 1 and 3 C. P. C. was moved with a request to get the statement of the petitioner recorded on commission. The learned Additional District Judge dismissed the application under Order 26 rules 1 and 3 C. P. C. and, also, closed the evidence of the petitioner. It is against this order that the present revision petition has been filed.