SINGHAL BROTHERS Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE petitioner, who is a partnership firm and a license under the Rajasthan Agricultural Produce Markets Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to the 'the Act), engaged in the business of sale and purchase of foodgrains at Flana; has filed this writ petition against the Krishi Upaj Mandi Semlti, Sumerpur, district -Pali, alleging that it is charging market -fee from the licencees transacting their business at Mandi premises but has not been providing the requisite facilities which the Mandi should provide at its yard and, therefore, the charge of market -fee from the petitioner and his likes is against the principle of quid pro quo.

(2.) THE respondents have filed return alongwith details of expenses incurred by the Agriculture Marketing Committee (hereinafter referred to as 'the Committee) during last five years and have also produced a chart (Ex, R. 2) conveying details of last 10 years' budget and actual income. It has also produced maps showing the projects which the Committee intends to taken on.

(3.) THE present case is not different from the one which was in Gokol Chand's case (supra).