BHIM SINGH Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THESE three writ petitions raise inter-connected disputes and hence have been heard together by consent of all concerned and are being disposed of by a common order.

(2.) THE controversies raised in the three writ petitions have been narrowed down considerable during the course of arguments and hence I need not give in details the various averments and contentions raised in the pleadings of the parties. I shall, therefore, confine myself to such salient features of the three cases, as are necessary for decision of the controversies raised before me.

(3.) IT may here be stated that during the pendency of the two writ petitions, the composition of Municipal Board Khudala Falna changed and with this changed complexion, Municipal Board Khudala Falna has instituted SB. Civil Writ Petition. No. 2992/92 pleading inte-alia that it cannot bear the financial burden of two posts of AR's and the government cannot insist upon the petitioner board to continue with Lal Singh as ARI. IT has challenged order Annexure 11 dated 16. 5. 92 whereby it has been directed that Lal Singh shall continue to work as ARI in Municipal Board Khudala Falna. This writ petition has been opposed on behalf of all the respondents. In all the cases, necessary counters have been filed.