RAMU RAM CHOUDHARY Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE case of the petitioner is that he passed his B.A. Examination in the year 1991 from Ajmer University and thereafter, he appeared in the Pre Teacher Education Test (for short "the PTET') 1991-92 held by Mohanlal Sukhadiya University, Udaipur. He cleared that examination and has obtained 299 marks. His Contention is that as per explanation (7) added to r. 5 of the Rules for Admission to B. Ed., Shiksha Shastri Coures, contained in General Guide Lines of Pre Teachers Education Test, 1991, there is a proviso that three choices for Teacher Education Institution (T.E.I.) of Rajasthan will be given by each candidate in order of preference.

(2.) IT was contended by the petitioner that he gave his choice for three places i.e. Jodhpur, Doongarpur and Udaipur in order of preference. According to him, although in Jodhpur, the persons who have obtained minimum marks of 311 have been given admission but in Doongarpur and Udaipur, persons having secured 296 and 294 marks have been given admission. IT was, therefore, argued by him that the persons who got lessor marks than him have been admitted in Udaipur and Doongarpur District and, therefore, he should have also been given admission. He has submitted that the persons who got 287 marks in Banswara District and the persons who got 286 marks in Jalore and Chittorgarh Districts have also been admitted in B.Ed. course and, therefore, he cannot be denied admission in B.Ed, course.

(3.) THESE submissions of Mr. R.N, Munshi, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner have been seriously opposed by Mr. D.R. Bhandari, the learned counsel appearing for respondent No. 2, as also by Mr. S.K. Vyas, the learned Addl. Govt. Advocate.