K L RAJPUROHIT Vs. UNIVERSITY OF JODHPUR

JUDGEMENT

(1.) A Researcher prays for Judges research by evaluation, interpretation and examination of the scheme of Ordinances of Ph. D. Chapter instead of submitting to the "Veto" of the Research Board. He has filed this writ petition precisely for the endorsement of his legal right under Ordinance 216 sub-clause (D) of the University of Jodhpur or re-enforcement of "Rule of Law" over 'Rule of Men". The University claims "Autonomy". Mr Parekh's plea is that Mr. Mridul is raising a worthless storm in a tea cut, which deserves to be nip in the bud by Nutron Bomb of Ordinance 224.

(2.) THE twin Ordinances around which the juristic debate pivots are 216D vs. 224.

(3.) AFTER making the above passing comment, the Examiner gave the following final report:- "Inspite of the above theoretical short comings, I am of the view that the Researcher has done commendable work by bringing together a lot of new facts relating to the subject and interpreting them in a refreshing manner. The candidate has also given proof of his capacity for critical thinking The literary presentation is also good. "I therefore, recommend the thesis for the award of the Ph. D. degree in Political Science of the University of Jodhpur."