(1.) The above two appeals raise common questions of law, so they are being disposed of by thts common judgment.
(2.) Both these appeals have been filed by the defendant-transferees of properties in suits for pre-emption, being unsuccessful in both the courts below, as the suits for pre-emption have been decreed by both the courts. The plaintiffs Ambalal and Heeralal instituted suits for pre-emption in respect of two immovable properties described in paras 2 of the plaints. In Civil Appeal No. 351/72, the property transferred consists of one 'Talia' and one 'Otla'. These immovable properties were sold by defendant No. 1 Dadamchand to the appellant Akbar Ali on 4-12-1967 for a sum of Rs. 1,000/- and in appeal No. 352/72 Dadamchand sold one house property for a sum of Rs. 500/- on 18-121967 to Mulla Abbas Bhai. The ground of pre-emption, as alleged by the plaintiffs in both the suits, is that the properties of the parties situate in one 'Gali' and a common 'Chowk' and they have common right of way and a common entrance. Defendant No. 3 Dhuraji also owns a house property in the same lane. The lane in which the properties of the parties and the three temples are situated, is a closed or blind lane towards north. The defendants denied the plaintiffs' right of pre-emption. The defendants also claimed easementary right over the transferred properties, so they claimed a preferential right of pre-emption.
(3.) Necessary issues were framed and after trial, the learned Civil Judge, Pratapgarh, decreed both the suits on August 10, 1971. The transferee- defendants preferred an appeal against the judgment and decrees of the trial court, but they were unsuccessful. Hence they preferred these second appeals.