B D BHARGAVA Vs. UNIVERSITY OF RAJASTHAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS is a plaintiff's appeal directed against the judgement and decree of the learned Additional District Judge No. 1, Jaipur City dismissing the plaintiff's suit, for declaring him as a validly appointed Professor and Director of the Rajasthan College of Commerce and for other consequential reliefs, on a preliminary point which was the subject-matter of issue No. 27.

(2.) THE plaintiff averred that he was appointed as Head of the Department in Maharaja's College, Jaipur on 1st August, 1933 and he became the Principal of the Rajasthan College of Commerce in the year 1956 In this capacity he came to be elected as a member of the Syndicate of the Rajasthan University, defendant No. 1 for a period of three years from 1957 to 1960. On 4th January, 1960 defendant No. 3 Dr. M. S. Mehta assumed charge of the Vice Chancellor of the University of Rajasthan. In May 1961 the University of Rajasthan decided to accept the Government proposal for taking over the College of Commerce along with two other Colleges. As a sequel to the transfer of the three colleges the existing administration and the attached staff were to be transferred to the University on certain terms. According to the plaintiff certain proposals regarding the proposed strength of the attached staff came before a meeting of the Syndicate. Eventually, high-powered committee was appointed for making certain selections. THE plaintiff claimed that on 8th July, 1962 he was selected by the high-powered committee for being appointed as Director (Principal) of the Commerce College. Defendant No. 3 however, did not communicate this decision of the high-powered committee to the Syndicate but issued a duty chart on 18th July, 1962 appointing the plaintiff as the Director of the Commerce College temporarily. THE plaintiff further averred that on 25th September, 1962 the Syndicate confirmed him on the post of the Director curn-Principal. His grievance was that though he was confirmed at this meeting on the very day, that is, on 26th September 1962, the defendant No. 3 got a meeting of the Syndicate convened and at this subsequent meeting the plaintiff's confirmation on the post of the Director-cum-Principal was re opened and it was left to be decided on a later date. THEre are several other averments in the plaint but it is not necessary to recapitulate them here.

(3.) THE learned counsel for the appellant prayed for refund of the court fee paid on the memo of appeal. He has paid Rs. 870/- Rs. 400/- may be refunded to the plaintiff appellant.