ROOP NARAIN Vs. HIRA LAL

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS is a second appeal by the defendant in a suit for eviction.

(2.) IT is common ground between the parties that the respondents Heeralal and Kishan Singh are father and son and landlords of the property in dispute and that the appellant is a tenant in a part of the house. The respondents filed a suit lor arrears of rent and eviction of the appellant in the court of the Munsiff, City Jodhpur on 2. 1. 1960. The appellant's eviction was sought on three grounds. IT was averred in the first instance that he was a defaulter. IT was next urged that he had become a nuisance since he had filed certain criminal complaints which were eventually dismissed having been found to be false and lastly that the portion of the property occupied by him was required by the respondents for their own personal use.