MOHAN NATH Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS appeal has been preferred by the Jagirdar under Sec. 39 of the Rajasthan Land Reforms and Resumption of Jagirs Act 1952 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) against the order of the Addl. Jagir Commissioner, Rajasthan, Jaipur, dated 23. 12. 61. The items questioned relate to rental income, income from grazing, income from Customs & Excise, income from sale of land and tribute.

(2.) SO far as the rental income goes the objection is regarding the rent of the lands alleged to have remained under occupation during the basic year but not entered m the Revenue Records of the subsequent years because of the same having been surrendered at the time or. the announcement of the new settlement introduced in the Jagir. The learned Addl. Jagir Commissioner has taken into consideration the rental income of all such lands as were satisfactorily proved to have remained under occupation and charged rent for during the basic year, leaving out the cases of lands not so proved. It is contended on behalf of the appellant that he had produced copies of the orders of the Asstt. Settlement Officer passed in year 1955. one year after the basic year, on the basis whereof it should be calculated that those lands did remain under the occupation of the persons concerned and were charged rent for.