LAWS(RAJ)-2022-3-291

UMA PAREEK Vs. MOTIRAM

Decided On March 14, 2022
Uma Pareek Appellant
V/S
MOTIRAM Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) The present misc. petition under Sec. 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code (hereinafter referred to as the 'Code') is directed against the order dtd. 23/12/2021, passed by the Judicial Magistrate, Kuchaman City, District Nagaur (hereinafter referred to as "the trial Court"), whereby petitioner's application dtd. 12/11/2021 under Sec. 311 of the Criminal Procedure Code has been rejected.

(2.) The facts relevant for the present purposes are that on 8/6/2018, the respondent-complainant filed a complaint under Sec. 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 against the present petitioner before the Court of the Judicial Magistrate, Kuchaman City, District Nagaur alleging, inter-alia, that the accused handed over a cheque for the sum of Rs.5,00,000.00, which got dishonoured with the remark "account closed". The petitioner took a plea that the signature on the cheque in question was not hers.

(3.) In order to establish the same, the present petitioner moved an application dtd. 1/3/2021 under Sec. 45 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, which application was rejected by the learned trial Court vide its order dtd. 1/3/2021, while observing that the same was filed belatedly.