CHHAIL SINGH Vs. STATE OF RAJ

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE petitioner-convict has sent this letter petition seeking 20 day's parole.

(2.) THE respondents have submitted in their reply that earlier the matter of the petitioner for grant of 20 day's parole was sent to the District Magistrate and the reports from the concerned were called but the same were found adverse; and that the matter of the petitioner for grant of 20 day's parole was considered by the District Parole Committee, Jalore on 02.02.2012 but looking to the adverse reports, the Parole Committee did not recommend the case of the petitioner for grant of parole. It is also submitted that the jail conduct of the petitioner-prisoner was not found satisfactory as he remained absent from jail factory, therefore, a warning was given to him on 03.05.2011. It is noticed that as on 23.03.2012, the petitioner has served the sentenced for a period of about 5 years 5 months and 11 days. We have also gone through the history ticket of the petitioner- prisoner as placed for perusal by the learned Government Counsel.