MUNICIPAL BOARD BEGUN Vs. SHIV PRAKASH

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THOUGH this appeal is reported to be time-barred by one day, however, it has been pointed out by the learned counsel that similar nature appeals have already been considered and permitted to be withdrawn with liberty to the appellant to make an application for review before the learned Single Judge because a concession was wrongly given; and a copy of the order dated 27.04.2012 as passed in SAW No. 272/2012 has placed before us for perusal, which reads as under:-

(2.) THE same prayer has been made before us for withdrawal with liberty to file a review application. In view of the above, in our opinion, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this appeal pending for consideration of the question of delay of one day, particularly when similar nature appeals against the common order dated 13.01.2012 have already been considered and decided. In the circumstances of the case, it appears in the interest of justice and in the fitness of things that while ignoring the delay, this appeal be also disposed of in the same manner in which SAW No.272/2012 has been decided by the order dated 27.04.2012.