HANUMAN @ MURLIDHAR Vs. STATE OF RAJ

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor.

(2.) THIS Criminal Revision Petition has been filed against the order dated 19th December 1994 passed by learned Sessions Judge, Jaisalmer in Cr. Appeal No.41/1991, affirming the conviction and sentence passed by learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jaisalmer vide order dated 09th October 1991 in Cr. Case No.106/1984, convicting accused-revision-petitioner for offence under sec.353 IPC and sentencing him to undergo 03 months' rigorous imprisonment, along with fine of Rs.100/- and in default of payment of the fine to further undergo 15 days' simple imprisonment.

(3.) FEELING aggrieved by the order of conviction and sentence passed by the trial court, the accused-petitioner filed an appeal before the Sessions Judge, Jaisalmer, which also came to be dismissed vide impugned judgment dated 19th December 1994. Aggrieved of impugned judgments of conviction & sentence passed by both the courts below, the accused-petitioner has filed present Revision Petition.