CHANGAN LAL Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE present misc. petition has been filed on behalf of the petitioner challenging the order dt. 11.01.2012 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Chittorgarh, whereby, whilst allowing the application under Sec. 389 Cr.P.C. filed by the petitioner subsequent to his conviction as recorded by the learned Addl. Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Chittorgarh in Regular Criminal Case No. 322/2006, he has directed the petitioner to deposit a sum of Rs. 1,77,625/ - for suspending his sentences. Learned counsel submits that in view of the authoritative pronouncement of the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Dilip S. Dahanukar vs. Kotak Mahindra Co. Ltd. & Anr., reported in : 2007 Cr.L.R. (SC) 462, the condition to deposit the whole of the cheque amount while suspending the sentences in an appeal virtually amounts to denial of the right to appeal. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner is ready to deposit a sum of Rs. 50,000/ - in the interim but the direction to deposit the whole of the cheque amount is not reasonable.

(2.) LEARNED counsel for the complainant does not object to the modification of the said condition subject to the petitioner deposits a sum of Rs. 50,000/ - in the interim but he prays that the learned Appellate Court be directed to decide the appeal expeditiously. Learned counsel for the petitioner does not object to this suggestion.