MANJU BISSA Vs. STATE

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THESE special appeals involving identical issues have been heard together; and are taken up for disposal by this common order. After having heard the learned counsel for the appellants and having perused the material placed on record, we are unable to find any reason to entertain these appeals against the similar nature orders whereby the learned Single Judge has, after taking note of all the facts and circumstances, rejected the respective writ petitions on the ground of inordinate delay.

(2.) FOR an insight into the relevant aspects, the impugned order dated 25.05.2012 as passed by the learned Single Judge in CWP No.4666/2012 (related with SAW No.725/2012) could be taken note of which, in its entirety, reads as under: -

(3.) EVEN if the petitioners -appellants seek to derive some semblance of cause of action with reference to the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Kailash Chand Sharma Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.: : (2002) 6 SCC 562, noticeable it is that the same was delivered way back in the year 2002. The learned counsel attempted to refer to another order passed by a learned Single Judge of this Court at the Jaipur Bench on 23.01.2009 in the case of Neeraj Saxena Vs. State & Ors. (SB CWP No. 6829/2006) but then, the said writ petition was also filed in the year 2006.