ANOOP SINGH Vs. ADDL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE present petition has been filed by the petitioner-original defendant no.2 ,invoking extra ordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Art. 227 of the Constitution of India, challenging the order dated 28.4.2012 passed by the Addl. District Judge, (Fast Track)No.2, Jaipur District, Jaipur, (hereinafter referred to as the trial court), whereby the trial court has rejected the application of the petitioner to hear the suit on day to day basis.

(2.) - It has been submitted by learned counsel Ms. Anita Aggrawal, for the petitioner that the petitioner is the subsequent purchaser of the suit land and an interim injunction is operating against him. She further submitted that the present respondent no.2 -original plaintiff keeps on giving applications one after the other just to prolong the proceedings of the suit, and that the proceedings of the suit are not being proceeded further for one reason or the other since the year 2007. Relying upon the copy of the order sheets produced along with the writ petition, she submitted that the application under Or. VI Rule 17 filed by the plaintiff has remained undecided since 2007. According to her, the petitioner is suffering great loss and hardship because of the pendency of the suit.