STATE OF RAJASTHAN Vs. ABHISHEK SINGH PANWAR

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE contesting respondent (writ petitioner) having appeared in caveat and looking to the subject matter of litigation, while dispensing with the service on the proforma respondents, with the consent and at the request of learned counsel for the parties, the matter has been heard finally at this stage itself.

(2.) THIS intra-court appeal is directed against the order dated 08.08.2012 as passed in CWP No. 11196/2011 whereby the learned Single Judge has allowed the petition filed on the grievance of the writ petitioner (respondent No. 1 herein) against the communication dated 20.10.2011 (Annex.7) whereby he was informed that his provisional admission to B.Tech. Course had been cancelled because the competent authority, i.e., the Board of Technical Education, Rajathan, Jodhpur had rejected his application.

(3.) THE writ petitioner-respondent No.1 submitted that the admission accorded to him had been cancelled without any opportunity of hearing and even without stating any reason. The respondent No.1 further submitted that the principal reason of cancellation was that he acquired the essential qualification of Higher Secondary in 10+2 Scheme by way of supplementary examination but this could not have been a valid reason for cancellation of his admission by assuming that he had acquired the requisite qualification after the cut-off date. According to the respondent No.1, his passing the supplementary examination related back to the original result.