RADHEGOPAL Vs. BOARD OF REVENUE AJMER

JUDGEMENT

(1.) LEARNED Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits he is not impugning the order dated 28-2-2008 passed by the Naib Tehsildar Bahrawanda Kalan, District Sawai Madhopur finding the petitioner guilty under Section 91 of the Rajasthan Land Revenue Act, 1956 (herein after `1956 Act'), nor is he impugning the directions for petitioner's removal from sivai chak (Government land) or payment of fine. He submits that the limited challenge in the writ petition is to the order of civil imprisonment for one month.

(2.) SENIOR Counsel submits that in the context of directions issued by the Naib Tehsildar Bahrawanda Kala, District Sawai Madhopur that petitioner be visited civil imprisonment for a period of one month under Section 91 (2) of the 1956 Act the petitioner has already surrendered and now he is jail since 28-4-2012. Counsel submits that under Section 91 (2) of the 1956 Act there is no minimum sentence prescribed and only the maximum of three months has been prescribed.