SURENDRA KUMAR JAGGI Vs. AHMED FAROOQ

JUDGEMENT

(1.) A quick review petition has been filed by the defendant tenant against the dismissal of his second appeal No. 1/2011 vide judgment & order dated 23.8.2012 by this Court dismissing the second appeal against the concurrent decree of eviction on the ground of bonafide and reasonable necessity of the respondent-plaintiff-landlord finding that no substantial question of law arises in the present second appeal of the defendant-tenant.

(2.) THE said judgment of 23 pages dismissing the second appeal at the admission stage, finding that no substantial question of law arises in the appeal is sought to be reviewed on the following contentions raised by Mr. M.C. Bhoot, learned Senior Advocate for the review petitioner-tenant.

(3.) IT is well settled that mere novelty of argument, repetition of argument and expansion of the same arguments raised, cannot be a ground of review. Unless there is any apparent error on the face of the judgment under review, such a review cannot be sought merely because the judgment is given against the review petitioner. Obviously the remedy lies else where in the form of appeal against the said judgment.