UNION OF INDIA Vs. CHUNNI LAL PUROHIT

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HAVING heard the learned counsel for the parties and having perused the material placed on record, we are unable to find any reason to consider interference in the just and proper order passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Jodhpur Bench, Jodhpur ('the CAT') in OA No.06/Jodhpur/2012.

(2.) THE applicant-respondent retired as Head Clerk from the office of Chief Works Manager, North Western Railway on 13.07.1988. A revised PPO was issued pursuant to implementation of 6th Pay Commission recommendations putting him in the scale of Rs.5000- 8000. Subsequently, it was sought to be alleged that the applicant had been incorrectly fixed; and while reducing the pension, consequential deduction orders were immediately issued. Admittedly, such orders for reduction and deductions were made without any notice to the applicant-respondent.

(3.) THE CAT further proceeded to clarify its order in the following:-