SHAHINA JAHID Vs. RAJASTHAN COOPERATIVE DAIRY FEDERATION LTD

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD learned counsel for the parties.

(2.) THE challenge in this intra-court appeal is the order dated 3rd November, 2009 passed by Single Bench, whereby writ petition filed by petitioner/appellant, against her termination order from service, has been dismissed.

(3.) FROM the averments and documents, it is clear that petitioner was initially appointed for a period of one year on contract basis on monthly consolidated amount. As per term of contract, the period of contract was two years or till the expiry of project, whichever is earlier. In the reply to writ petition, it was clearly mentioned that project, in which, petitioner was appointed has come to an end. Although certain documents were placed on record, but from the same, it is clear that the same were not in respect of the project in which petitioner was appointed. Learned Single Judge has also opined and observed that from these documents, it cannot be presumed that other persons, who have been allowed to continue were in the same project in which petitioner was appointed. The services of the petitioner were dispensed with way back in September, 1995. In the order dated 8th September, 1995, it is specifically mentioned that the period of appointment came to an end on 31st March, 1995. However, as per order dated 5th June, 1995, a months' notice was also given and services of appellant were dispensed with w.e.f. 8th October, 1995.