RUKHADI DEVI Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) WE have heard the learned counsel for the appellants- applicants as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the record.

(2.) IT is submitted by the learned counsel for theappellants- applicants that the appellants-applicants are ladies and they were on bail during the trial; that no specific act has been assigned to each of them as per the prosecution evidence; that nothing has been recovered from the applicant Rukhadi; that there is a contradictory evidence about recovery of weapon from Surti Devi; and that in any case, there is no specific evidence about common object towards the alleged offence and about the applicants doing any specific act in furtherence of such common object. IT is further submitted that there are glaring discrepancies and contradictions in theprosecution evidence; and that so far the applicants are concerned, no purpose would be served with their detention during pendency of this appeal.