GOVIND RAM Vs. ANKIT

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE instant Misc. Petition No.2793/2011 has been preferred by petitioner Govind Ram, who is father of respondent Ankit, challenging the order dated 6.4.2011 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Sumerpur in Criminal Revision No.21/2010 whereby he partly allowed the revision filed by Govind Ram against the order dated 6.4.2010 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Sumerpur in Criminal Case No.104/2004. The learned Magistrate granted maintenance to the tune of Rs.3,000/- per month from the date of application i.e. 20.3.2004. The learned revisional court modified the said order and directed that the maintenance would be payable to Ankit from the date of order i.e. 6.4.2010 and not from the date of the application.

(2.) REVISION Petition No.408/2011 has been filed by Ankit against the aforesaid order dated 6.4.2011 whereby maintenance granted to him has been modified to be payable from the date of order and not from the date of application.

(3.) HE submits that the learned Magistrate for justifiable causes accepted the application from the date of filing thereof and the learned revisional court has wrongly and unjustly interfered in the said order and that too simply on the ground that no special reasons wee mentioned for accepting the application from the date of filing. He, therefore, urged that the order passed by the learned revisional court be quashed and that of the learned Magistrate be restored.