(1.) HEARD learned counsel for the parties.
(2.) THE petitioner/appellant has preferred this Special Appeal against order dated 11th October, 2011, whereby her S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.8106/2006 was disposed of by modifying the order dated 7th December, 2005 (Annex.5) and also against order of Single Bench dated 9th November, 2011, whereby S.B. Civil Review Petition No. 361/2011 was dismissed.
(3.) THE Single Bench, after considering the above direction of Single Bench of this Court, came to a conclusion that a direction was given to consider the case of petitioner for regularization on the post of Junior Engineer and in case age of the petitioner comes in her way then to grant age relaxation. THEreafter, case of petitioner was considered and while granting age relaxation, a recommendation was made in her favour for regularization of her service and consequently the order dated 7th December, 2005 was passed. THE Single Bench, after considering all the facts and circumstances of the case, modified the order dated 7th December, 2005 to the extent that it should be treated to be regularization of petitioner's services on the post of Junior Engineer (Civil) from the date of issuance of the order dated 7th December, 2005 instead of treating it to be case of fresh appointment. As per modify order, the petitioner has been entitled for treating her services to be continuous. THE matter was again examined, while deciding review petition by Single Bench.