MADHU KAPOOR Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ANOTHER

JUDGEMENT

(1.) The instant Misc. Petition has been preferred by the petitioner seeking quashing of the proceedings pending in the Court of learned ACJM, Sagwara in Cr. Misc. Case No. 404/08 against him for the offence under Sec. 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.

(2.) Learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned PP and also learned counsel for the respondent No. 2 states to this Court that during pendency of the proceeding before the trial Court, the complainant filed an application before the learned Magistrate on 24.11.2011 stating therein that he desired to withdraw the complaint, as the amount of cheque had been received by him and, therefore, the matter be decided by way of compromise. The application field for the compromise was rejected by the learned Magistrate on 25.11.2011 and hence this Misc. Petition has been preferred by the petitioner seeking quashing of the proceedings of the complaint.

(3.) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that by virtue of Sec. 147 of the N.I.Act, the offence under the said Act has been made compoundable and no permission of the Court is required for compounding the said offence. He, therefore, submits that since the complainant himself has filed an application before the trial Court for withdrawal of the complaint by effect of compromise, the learned Magistrate has committed grave error in rejecting the said application and by insisting for continuance of the complaint.