MADHU VERMA Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) AFTER having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner in this review petition, at the first blush, we are of the tentative opinion that there being nothing of an apparent error in the impugned order dated 13.03.2012 as passed by a co-ordinate Bench in SAW No.813/2003, this review petition was required to be dismissed summarily but then, for the submission as repeatedly made, we have examined the matter fartherer; and what we find is that the attempt on the part of the petitioner is to over-reach the process of law. In the circumstances of the case, even while not entertaining this review petition, we feel rather compelled to make comments adverse to the petitioner and to saddle with her costs.

(2.) THE relevant background aspects of the matter for the present purpose are that the petitioner herein was working on the post of Teacher with the non-petitioner No.3: Shri Sanatan Dharma Girls Senior Higher Secondary School, Sri Ganganagar ('the institution' hereinafter); and her services came to be terminated by the order dated 18.03.1999. There had been another dispute between the petitioner and the institution regarding the outstanding amount for the joining period when she was transferred from one place to another. These matters were taken to the Rajasthan Non-Governmental Educational Institution Tribunal, Jaipur ('the Tribunal') who, by the order dated 30.08.2003, accepted the prayers as made by the petitioner and while quashing the termination order dated 18.03.1999, directed her reinstatement and payment of the outstanding amount but while leaving it open for the institution to initiate an inquiry as per rules.

(3.) THE Division Bench, however, did not leave the matter at that only and proceeded to issue further directions, in the apparent anxiety to ensure proper compliance of the order of the Tribunal. These directions, as contained in paragraph-15 of the judgment dated 13.03.2012 read as under: