GOPAL LAL KAKHANI Vs. BALMUKAND

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE appellant, Gopal Lal Kakhani, is aggrieved by the judgment dated 23.2.2010 passed by the Special Judicial Magistrate (Negotiable Instrument Act Cases), Bhilwara, whereby the learned Magistrate has acquitted the respondent No.l, Balmukand, for offences under Sections 138 of the N.I. Act. ('the Act', for short).

(2.) BRIEFLY the facts of the case are that Gopal Lal Kakhani, had submitted a complaint on 4.1.2007, before the learned trial court. In the complaint, he had claimed that he had given a loan of Rs. 10,000/- to Balmukand Soni. In order to repay the said loan, Balmukand Soni, had issued a cheque, cheque No. 041888 dated 15.6.2006, for the said amount. On 19.10.2006, when the complainant submitted the cheque for encashment, the cheque was dishonored on the ground of insufficient fund in the account. He further claimed that on 18.11.2006, he had sent a notice to Balmukand Soni. How ever, despite having received the said notice Balmukand Soni, failed to repay the loan amount within the stipulated period of fifteen days.

(3.) MR . Sanjay Nahar, the learned counsel for the appellant, has vehemently contended that the learned Magistrate has failed to appreciate the evidence in proper perspective. The Magistrate has erred in observing that the complainant had received the information with regard to dishonour of the cheque on 19.10.2006. The learned counsel had drawn the attention of the Court to Ex. P-3, which clearly shows that the information was received by the complainant on 20.10.2006. Therefore, the learned Magistrate has erred in concluding that the notice sent on 18.11.2006 was not within the stipulated period.