(1.) Learned counsel for the parties are in agreement that the controversy involved in this petition for writ is no more res integra in view of the judgment of this court in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.13811/2011 decided on 13.04.2012. The only difference I found in the matter is that the petitioner in the present case is holding the post of Peon, whereas in the case referred above, the petitioners were holding the post of Patient Counselor.
(2.) Having considered all the facts of the case and the law laid down by this court in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.13811/2011, this petition for writ is disposed of with the following observations and directions :-